Question bank / Command of Evidence
| Garden | Native plants (% of all plants) | Bee visits per hour, native plants | Bee visits per hour, non-native plants |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 80 | 14.2 | 6.1 |
| B | 50 | 11.8 | 7.4 |
| C | 20 | 9.5 | 8.9 |
An ecologist counted bee visits to flowering plants in three community gardens that differed in the share of their plants that were native to the region. She concluded that in every garden, native plants received more bee visits than non-native plants did, but that this advantage shrank as the share of native plants in a garden decreased.
Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to support the ecologist's conclusion?
Native plants in Garden A received 14.2 bee visits per hour, more than native plants in either of the other gardens received.
Non-native plants in Garden C received 8.9 bee visits per hour, more than non-native plants in either of the other gardens received.
In Garden B, where half of the plants were native, native plants received 11.8 bee visits per hour and non-native plants received 7.4.
Native plants received 8.1 more visits per hour than non-native plants in Garden A, 4.4 more in Garden B, and only 0.6 more in Garden C.
Answer: D
The conclusion has two parts: native plants got more visits in every garden, and the gap got smaller as the native share fell from 80% (A) to 50% (B) to 20% (C). Choice D gives the gap for each garden: 14.2 minus 6.1 is 8.1, 11.8 minus 7.4 is 4.4, and 9.5 minus 8.9 is 0.6. Both parts are shown.
Choice C is accurate and shows native plants ahead in one garden, but it gives no comparison across gardens, so it cannot show the advantage shrinking.
Why the other choices are wrong
Got it wrong? On SAT Owl, Owl looks at the answer you chose and explains the exact mistake, then gives you similar questions until it sticks. Get your predicted SAT score free, or take a free full-length practice test.